#Saddam hussein capture a lie pro#

These include both political-nationalist organisations like the Unification Front for the Liberation of Iraq or the Kurdish PKK, and religious guerrillas like the Wahhabi Sunni Muslim-sponsored Committee of the Faith, and many more Shia-Islamist groups. And there have been pro-Saddam demonstrations.) 'Saddam remnants' or Baathist 'loyalists' and 'dead-enders' are only one of the many groups fighting the Anglo-American forces. (After his capture, violence remains unabated. The latest events raise three issues: What lies ahead for Iraq? Will relations between Washington and other major powers change? What will and should happen to Hussein? His capture will not greatly alter the ground-situation or the insurgency in progress. 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' remains thoroughly unjust. Hussein's capture does not alter the character or (in)justice of the war or the occupation.

Rather, they wanted to disarm Iraq of its alleged weapons of mass destruction not one of which has been found so far. But it's important to recall that the US and its allies did not go to war to capture Hussein. Not many people will shed tears for a dictator who was infamous for his extraordinary brutality.

#Saddam hussein capture a lie pro#

This should at once warn us against the euphoria that is being drummed up in many capitals of the world, and duly conveyed by sections of the media elated in the manner of American pro consul L Paul Bremer. For most of them, he was a hated, but already deposed and disgraced, ruler, hardly about to return to power. He was a symbol of war more for Washington than for the Iraqi people. This means that Hussein could not have directed or orchestrated the armed resistance to the occupation powers in Iraq. An Arab newspaper has identified his betrayer as General Mohammed Ibrahim Omar al-Muslit, a relative and companion-in-hiding, who led the US troops to the hideout after drugging him.

In all probability, Hussein was betrayed by his own bodyguards who had an eye on the $25 million reward.

Two unidentified men were detained with him along with AK-47 rifles. This is reinforced by the fact that Hussein was carrying no communication device, although he had $750,000 in cash. Hussein could not have come out of it without help from the outside, especially in removing the camouflage cover.ДЄll this, and the fact that Hussein immediately offered to negotiate (according to Major Brian Reed, of the 4th Infantry Division) suggests that he was not so much in hiding as a prisoner. Its single opening was just three feet by one-and-half feet. The 'spider hole' was barely enough for a single person to lie down in. His hideout was outside a derelict, ramshackle, mud hut with a tiny bedroom and a badly maintained kitchen, without even a latrine. The circumstances in which Hussein was reportedly 'discovered' raise many questions. For those Iraqis who had suffered his awesome oppression, it was a cause for jubilation. Among many Arabs, the tame surrender produced disdain: the man who pretended to be a modern-day Saladin and our epoch's greatest Arab warrior turned out to be a coward who refused to use the gun he was carrying. Those who expected to see the arrogant face of a savage tyrant who made millions of people shake with fear were astonished to see a bedraggled old man with long-unwashed hair, submitting docilely to a United States army doctor examining him for tooth decay and lice. The capture of Iraq's former president Saddam Hussein had all the elements of surprise, drama and shock.